بین‌الملل در راه؛ صورت‌بندی نوین از مقاومت در روابط بین‌الملل (مطالعه موردی جنبش اقلیم مردم)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

10.22054/jrgr.2024.76868.1062

چکیده

جهان با شتاب بسیاری در حال تحول و دگرگونی است. این تغییرات در سطوح و وجوه مختلف بروز و ظهور یافته است. در پسا جنگ ‌سرد و آغاز قرن بیست‌ویکم، امکان بیشتری برای نقش‌آفرینی جریان‌های مقاومت و کنشگری برای کنشگران غیردولتی روابط بین‌الملل ایجادشده است. بنابراین، نیاز به تولید ادبیات و تألیف آثار جدید پیرامون این محورها بیش‌ازپیش احساس شده است؛ اما همچنان در بیشتر تألیفات علمی و دانشگاهی خلأ محسوسی در ارتباط با موضوعاتی چون «مقاومت» در ابعاد نوینش مشاهده می‌شود. در این راستا، این پژوهش بر آن است تا نشان دهد که آیا می‌توان در تاریخ اکنون روابط بین‌الملل، صورت‌بندی نوینی از مقاومت در روابط بین‌الملل ارائه کرد؟ این صورت‌بندی از مقاومت، دارای چه ویژگی‌هایی است و خواهد بود؟ استدلال پژوهش بر این است که در اکنون و آینده‌ای که در راه است، مقاومت در قالب پیوندی جمعی و بین‌المللی با امکان نوعی در اشتراک بودن بدون مشترک بودن میان کنشگران آن فراهم می‌شود؛ نوعی «بین‌الملل در راه». در این راستا، سامان جمعی مدنظر است که به‌ معنای «یک‌شکل شدن» یا «همگون ‌شدن» نیست، بلکه به ‌معنای هدف و عمل مشترک است، بدون حذف خصوصیات متفاوت گروه‌ها و افراد. این پژوهش با توجه به رهیافتِ ژاک دریدا به بررسی و تحلیل مقاومت در روابط بین‌الملل می‌پردازد. روش مورداستفاده در این پژوهش، مطالعه موردی کیفی است. در این راستا، «جنبش اقلیم مردم» بررسی خواهد شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The International-to-Come: A New Formulation of Resistance in International Relations (A Case Study of the People's Climate Movement)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Khodakhah Azar 1
  • Seyed Masoud Mousavi Shafaee 2
1 Ph.D., Department of International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The world is undergoing rapid and profound changes. These transformations have occurred and emerged in various aspects and levels. in the post-Cold War era and the beginning of the 21st century, Greater opportunities have emerged for the resistance movements in shaping events and activism for non-state actors in international relations. So, the need for the production of literature and the authoring of new works on these topics has been felt more than ever before. However, there is still a noticeable gap in most scientific and academic writings about subjects like "resistance" in its contemporary dimensions. In this regard, this research aims to show whether it is possible to present a novel framework of resistance in international relations in the context of history of the present of international relations? What are the characteristics of this framework of resistance, and what will they be? The argument of this research is that in the present and the future that is unfolding, resistance in the form of a collective and international linkage, with the possibility of being in common without being common is facilitated among its actors; a form of “the International-to-come”. In this regard, the concept of collective agency is considered, which does not imply uniformity or homogenization, but rather a shared purpose without erasing the distinct characteristics of different groups and individuals. This research, based on the approach of Jacques Derrida, examines and analyzes resistance in international relations. The method employed in this study is a qualitative case study. In this regard, the "People's Climate Movement" will be investigated.
Based on the proposed content, this research is a modest attempt to examine resistance in the contemporary era. It aims to strengthen dialogues and, consequently, foster interdisciplinary discussions about the theoretical, inclusive, and international dimensions of this concept. Given that orthodox perspectives and narrow views in mainstream international relations hinder such reflections, this research seeks to take a different path and analyze the issue through an interdisciplinary approach. Therefore, it delves into the examination and analysis of resistance in international relations, drawing upon the approach of Jacques Derrida.
This research delves into the important aspects of Derrida's views that are relevant to the present study. Specters of Marx is a 1993 book by Jacques Derrida. According to Derrida, the spirit of Marx holds even greater relevance in the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the decline of communism. With the demise of communism, the specter of communism begins to reappear on Earth. Derrida seeks to inherit from Marx, not communism itself, but rather the philosophy of responsibility and Marx's spirit of radical critique. In his work, Derrida identifies ten plagues of the global system and presents an account of the emergence of a new form of activism called the "New International". This research emphasizes two concepts in Derrida's approach to analyzing resistance in international relations: the "New International" and "Spectrality".
International activism, as a specter-like action, is constantly evolving and changing. Therefore, it represents a collective framework that does not lead to uniformity or homogenization, but rather signifies a shared action based on the diverse characteristics of groups and individuals. International activism forms a bond of kinship, shared suffering, and hope. Specters of "the International-to-come" do not allow us to forget that any imposed unity carries within it a multiplicity. Essentially, anything left out of the defining process returns as a spectral presence in a different form. Therefore, "the International-to-come" lacks a coherent center and a regulated periphery. It is a collection of diverse and uncoordinated struggles and organizations that prioritize points of connection with common objectives. They are of the nature of Communitas (being in common without being common). In accordance with Derrida's interpretation, "the International-to-come" must leave an empty space for unknown and anonymous activism. This act of leaving an empty space signifies a form of indeterminacy and anonymity that implies hospitality for what is yet to come in the future.
In a specific case study within the research, the "People's Climate Movement" was examined. The People's Climate Movement was a global climate movement that took place in over 400 cities worldwide in 2014 and has continued to evolve. It is important to note that this uprising is not the ultimate representation and embodiment of resistance in the form of " International-to-come". Rather, it serves as an example that, if we want to see how "the International-to-come" can manifest in the real world, this movement demonstrates a part of its shaping and formulation. Within the research's topic and theoretical framework, the People's Climate Movement can be understood as a metaphorical call to accept the responsibility of ancestral heritage by the survivors and strive for reform through reliance on the revelations of the specter of resistance. The "people," as the primary center of the climate movement, play a crucial role in protests, global demonstrations, whistleblowing, coordination among various institutions, and exerting pressure on governments and international organizations for collaboration, it is evident in the example of the climate movement's key role in the United Nations Climate Conference in 2014. This ultimately led to the Paris Agreement on climate change. On the other hand, the People's Climate Movement fulfills the role of the promised activism of past generations. This movement represents a resistance born out of the present, and it is not waiting for the appearance of a promised messiah. Furthermore, it does not hesitate to seize any opportunity for activism, ranging from large-scale gatherings to unconventional and occasionally controversial actions, such as spraying paint on valuable artworks and buildings, and other similar acts. These instances allude to the hidden capacities of the movement in the realm of resistance, which may exist like a specter in our world, seeking an opportunity to emerge based on the exigencies of time and place. Furthermore, the movement has charted a long-term trajectory, namely the fight against climate change, but it restricts the short-term actions of leadership.
Ultimately, the activists of "the International-to-come" do not seek to seize power or dominate the future and the prevailing discourse in international relations. Instead, they demand recognition of their concerns and anxieties.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resistance
  • International Relations
  • The International-To-Come
  • People's Climate Movement
فارسی
اشتاین، روبرت. (1382). والتر بنیامین. (مجید مددی، مترجم) تهران: اختران.
بنیامین، والتر (1375). تزهایی درباره فلسفه تاریخ. (مراد فرهادپور، مترجم). ارغنون. شماره 11 و 12.
تاجیک، محمدرضا (1398). زیست جنبش: این جنبش یک جنبش نیست. تهران: نگاه معاصر.
تقوی، محمدعلی (1396). ریشه‌های بهار عربی و دومینوی فروپاشی رژیم‌های عرب (تعیین‌کنندگی عوامل کوتاه‌مدت و نقش مدیریت سیاسی). دولت پژوهی. 3(11)، 1-26.‎
تورن، آلن (1400). بازگشت کنشگر: نظریه اجتماعی در جامعه پساصنعتی. (سلمان صادقی‌زاده، مترجم). تهران: ثالث.
دولاکامپانی، کریستیان (1382). فلسفه سیاست در جهان معاصر. (بزرگ نادرزاده، مترجم). تهران: هرمس
شکسپیر، ویلیام (1392). هملت. (م.ا.به آذین، مترجم).. تهران: دات.
کاستلز، مانوئل (1393)، شبکه‌های خشم و امید؛ جنبش‌های اجتماعی در عصر اینترنت، (مجتبی قُلی‌پور، مترجم). تهران: مرکز.
مارتل، جیمز آر. (1399). خشونت الهی: والتر بنیامین و فرجام شناسی حاکمیت. (طلایی زاده، مترجم). تهران: شب‌خیز.
موسوی شفائی، مسعود و خداخواه آذر، سمیه (1398). رسانه‌های اجتماعی مبتنی بر وب دو و کارگزاری در روابط بین الملل. پژوهش‌های روابط بین الملل9(2)، 29-68.‎
نگری، آنتونیو و هارت، مایکل (۱۳۸۷). انبوه خلق: جنگ و دموکراسی در عصر امپراتوری. (رضا نجف زاده، مترجم). چاپ دوم. تهران: نی.
نگری، آنتونیو و هارت، مایکل. (۱۳۹۱). امپراتوری (تبارشناسی جهانی شدن). (رضا نجف زاده، مترجم). تهران: قصیده سرا.
هارت، مایکل و نگری، آنتونیو (1401). اسمبلی. (فواد حبیبی، مترجم). تهران: نگاه.
Translated Refrences into English
Benjamin, W. (1996). Theses on the Philosophy of History. (M. Farhadpour, Trans.). Arghanoon, 11-12. [In Persian] 
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. John Wiley & Sons. (M. Gholipour, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz. [In Persian] 
Delacampagne, C. (2003). Political Philosophy in Contemporary World. (B. Naderzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Hermes. [In Persian] 
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012). Empire. (R. Najafzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Ghesseh Sara. [In Persian] 
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2022). Assembly. (F. Habibi, Trans.). Tehran: Negah. [In Persian] 
Martel, J. (2020). Divine violence: Walter Benjamin and the eschatology of sovereignty. (Talaeizadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Shabkhoz. [In Persian] 
Mousavi Shafaee, S. M., & Khodakhah Azar, S. (2019). Web-based social media and brokerage in international relations. International Relations Research, 9(2), 29-68. [In Persian] 
Negri, A. & Hardt, M. (2008). Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire. (R. Najafzadeh, Trans.). 2nd edition. Tehran: Ney. [In Persian] 
Shakespeare, W. (2013). Hamlet. (M. A. Behazin, Trans.). Tehran: Dot. [In Persian] 
Stein, R. (2003). Walter Benjamin. (M. Maddahi, Trans.). Tehran: Akhtaran. [In Persian] 
Taghavi, S. M. A. (2017). The Roots of the Arab Spring and the Domino Effect of Collapsing Arab Regimes; the Determining Role of Short-Run Factors and Political Management. State Studies, 3(11), 1-26. [In Persian] 
Tajik, M. R. (2019). Bio-movement: This movement is not a movement. Tehran: Negahe Moaser. [In Persian] 
Touraine, A. (2021). Return of the Actor: Social Theory in Postindustrial Society. (S. Sadeghizadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Salis. [In Persian] 
 
Refrences
Agamben, G. (1993) The coming community. Translated by Michael Hardt. Minneapolis. MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Apple. (2021). Environmental Progress Report. from: https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Environmental_Progress_Report_2021.pdf (Retrieved: August 2023).
Badiou, A. (2012). The rebirth of history: Times of riots and uprisings. Verso Books.
Baldwin, D. A. (2014). Neoliberalism, neorealism, and world politics. In The Realism Reader (pp. 313-319). Routledge.
Bayat, A. (2010). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East. Stanford University Press.
Bayat, A. (2017). Revolution without revolutionaries: Making sense of the Arab Spring. Stanford University Press.
Bayat, A. (2021). Revolutionary life: The everyday of the Arab Spring. Harvard University Press.
Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2020). The globalization of world politics: An introduction to international relations. 8nd edition. Oxford university press.
Bulkeley, H. & Betsill, M. M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the 'urban' politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42-63.
Bulkeley, H. & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136-154.
Bullard, R. D. (2014). Environmental justice in the 21st century: Race still matters. Phylon: The Clark Atlanta University Review of Race and Culture, 51(1), 23-26.
Cassegård, C. (2022). The future of environmental movements. In M. Grasso & M. Giugni (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements (pp. 577-589). Routledge.
Certo, M., Leigh, J., & Rogstad, A. (2019). Revolution and Resistance in World Politics. Millennium, 47(3), 323-325.
Congress.gov, (2019). Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal. From: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/text
Dean, J. (2019). Communicative capitalism and revolutionary form. Millennium, 47(3), 326-340.
Della, D. & Parks, L. (2014). Framing processes in the climate movement: From climate change to climate justice. Routledge handbook of the climate change movement, 19-30.
de Moor, J. & Wahlström, M. (2022). Environmental movements and their political context. In Maria Grasso and Marco Giugni (Eds). In Routledge Handbook of Environmental Sociology (pp. 263-277). Routledge.
Derrida, J., & Stiegler, B. (2002). Echographies of Television, trans. Jennifer Bajorek. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Derrida, Jacques (1994), Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, The Work of Mourning & the New International, translated by Peggy Kamuf, New York: Routledge.
Dunlap, R. E., & Brulle, R. J. (Eds). (2015). Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Eschle, C., & Maiguashca, B. (2007). Rethinking globalised resistance: feminist activism and critical theorising in international relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(2), 284-301.
Falzon, D. et al. (2018). To change everything, it takes everyone: recursivity in the People’s Climate March. Interface: A journal for and about social movements, 10(1–2), 92-116.Schlosberg, David (2013). Theorising environmental justice:The expanding sphere of a discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 37-55.
Fierro, A. (2019). Revolutionary Politics of Social Rights? An Ethnographic Account of the Homeless Workers’ Movement in São Paulo. Millennium, 47(3), 398-416.
Forno, F & Wahlen,S (2022).  Environmental activism and everyday life. In Maria Grasso and Marco Giugni (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements (pp. 434-450). Routledge.
Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. John Wiley & Sons.
Grasso, M. & Giugni, M. (Eds). (2022). Environmental movements worldwide. In The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements (pp. 1-16). Routledge.
Han, H. & Barnett-Loro, C. (2018). To support a stronger climate movement, focus research on building collective power. Frontiers in Communication, 55.
IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
IPCC. (2020). Key messages from the IPCC Special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. From:  https://unfccc.int/documents/267028 (Retrieved: August 2023).
Jacobson, M. Z et al. (2018). Matching demand with supply at low cost in 139 countries among 20 world regions with 100% intermittent wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) for all purposes. Renewable Energy, 123, 236-248.
Johnson, E. W. & Agnone, J. (2022). Policy and legislative outcomes of environmental movements.J. In Maria Grasso and Marco Giugni (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environmental Movements (pp. 453-471). Routledge.
Kakenmaster, William (2019).Articulating Resistance: Agonism, Radical Democracy and Climate Change Activism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 1-25.
Klein, N. (2015). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Simon and Schuster.
Lamy S. L.(2001). Contemporary Mainstream Approaches: Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism, in J. Bayliss and S. Smith (Eds.), The Globalization of World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 182-199.
Lewis, T. (1996). The politics of “hauntology” in Derrida's Specters of Marx. Rethinking Marxism, 9(3), 19-39.
Millennium (2019). Volume 47 Issue 3, June.
Moghadam, V. M. (2019). What is revolution in the 21st century? Towards a socialist-feminist world revolution. Millennium, 47(3), 470-482.
Paliewicz, N. S. (2019). Making sense of the people’s climate march: Towards an aesthetic approach to the rhetoric of social protest. Western Journal of Communication, 83(1), 94-112.
REN21. (2019). Renewables 2019: Global status report. REN21 Secretariat. From:https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report_en.pdf (Retrieved: August 2023).
Rockefeller Brothers Fund. (2014). Divestment from fossil fuels. From: https://www.rbf.org/about/our-history/timeline/fossil-fuel-divestment (Retrieved: August 2023).
Rogelj, J. den Elzen, M. Höhne, N. Fransen, T. Fekete, H. Winkler, H. ... & Schaeffer R. (2018). Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2°C. Nature, 534(7609), 631-639.
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
Stern, N. (2014). Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. MIT Press.
Stiglitz, Joseph (2019). The climate crisis is our third world war. From: https://znetwork.org/znetarticle/the-climate-crisis-is-our-third-world-war / (Retrieved: August 2023).
The Guardian (2019). Across the globe, millions join biggest climate protest ever. From:  https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/21/across-the-globe-millions-join-biggest-climate-protest-ever (Retrieved: August 2023).
The Guardian. A (2014). Fossil fuel divestment: A brief history. The Guardian, 12. From: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/08/fossil-fuel-divestment-a-brief-history
Thorson, K, et al. (2016). Climate and sustainability| seeking visibility in a big tent: Digital communication and the people’s climate march. International Journal of Communication, 10, 23.
UNFCCC. (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. From: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf (Retrieved: August 2023).
Von Storch, L. et al (2021). New climate change activism: before and after the Covid‐19 pandemic. Social Anthropology, 29(1), 205.
Waever, O. (1996). The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate, In S. Smith, et al. eds. International Theory: positivism and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149-185.
Wallace-Wells, D. (2019). The uninhabitable earth. In The Best American Magazine Writing 2018 (pp. 271-294). Columbia University Press.