نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار اقتصادسیاسی و سیاسگذاری‌عمومی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات آمریکای شمالی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

10.22054/jrgr.2026.91684.1137

چکیده

جنگ تعرفه‌ای میان ایالات متحده و چین به‌عنوان یکی از برجسته‌ترین چالش‌های اقتصادی قرن بیست‌ویکم، تأثیر قابل‌توجهی بر نظام تجارت جهانی گذاشته است. هدف این پژوهش، تحلیل اثرات آینده این جنگ بر تجارت جهانی و بررسی میزان سازگاری آن با اصول و مقررات سازمان تجارت جهانی است. روش پژوهش توصیفی ـ تحلیلی و مبتنی بر تحلیل محتوا و روش  است. ابتدا چارچوب نظری مبتنی بر نظریه‌های اقتصاد سیاسی تجارت تدوین شد تا مسیرهای علّی بالقوه بین جنگ تعرفه‌ای و تغییرات ساختاری در تجارت جهانی مشخص شود. سپس منابع کتابخانه‌ای، گزارش‌های بین‌المللی، مقالات علمی و بیانیه‌های رسمی جمع‌آوری و با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوا کدگذاری شدند. برای افزایش اعتبار استنتاج‌ها، دو مطالعه موردی انتخاب و مسیرهای علّی در آن‌ها بررسی شد. نتایج نشان می‌دهد جنگ تعرفه‌ای آمریکا و چین، صرفاً یک اختلاف اقتصادی محدود نیست، بلکه پدیده‌ای راهبردی است که موجب اختلال در جریان تجارت دوجانبه، تغییر در الگوهای سرمایه‌گذاری و بازآرایی زنجیره‌های تأمین جهانی شده است. این روند، کشورها را به بازنگری در سیاست‌های تجاری و ایجاد ائتلاف‌های جدید منطقه‌ای و بین‌المللی واداشته است. جنگ تعرفه‌ای به‌عنوان جلوه‌ای از رقابت ژئو‌اقتصادی میان قدرت‌های بزرگ، آینده تجارت جهانی را به سمت چندقطبی‌شدن، افزایش موانع تجاری و رشد حمایت‌گرایی اقتصادی سوق می‌دهد. بر این اساس، تداوم این روند می‌تواند منجر به بازتعریف قواعد تجارت آزاد و کاهش نقش نهادهای بین‌المللی در تنظیم روابط اقتصادی جهانی شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The U.S.–China Trade War: An Analysis of Its Future Impacts on Global Trade

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mitra Rahnejat 1
  • Morteza Bananejad 2

1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Economy and Public Policy, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.A Student, Department of North American Studies, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Problem Statement
The tariff war between the United States and China has emerged as one of the most significant developments in the contemporary international economic system. Since 2018, the United States has imposed a series of tariffs on Chinese imports, citing concerns related to trade imbalances, intellectual property rights, technology transfer, and national security. In response, China adopted retaliatory tariff measures against a wide range of American products. Consequently, what initially appeared to be a bilateral trade dispute evolved into a broader geo-economic confrontation with far-reaching implications for global trade? The significance of the United States–China tariff war extends beyond the economic relations of the two countries. As the world's two largest economies and major actors in international trade, any disruption in their commercial interactions inevitably affects global supply chains, international investment flows, production networks, and trade governance mechanisms. The tariff war has challenged the principles of free trade and economic liberalization that have characterized the global trading system for decades. Moreover, it has raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in resolving disputes between major powers and maintaining a rules-based trading order. Previous studies have primarily focused on the immediate economic consequences of the tariff war, including its effects on trade volumes, production costs, consumer prices, and bilateral trade balances. However, relatively less attention has been paid to the long-term and structural implications of the conflict for global trade. In particular, the relationship between tariff protectionism, geo-economic competition, and the emergence of neo-mercantilist policies requires further scholarly examination. This study seeks to address this gap by analyzing the future effects of the United States–China tariff war on global trade and evaluating its implications within the broader framework of international political economy.
Research Objective
The primary objective of this study is to analyze the future impacts of the United States–China tariff war on global trade and to assess the extent to which these developments are consistent with the principles and regulations of the World Trade Organization. The research also aims to examine how the tariff war contributes to structural transformations in the international trading system, including the reconfiguration of global supply chains, changes in foreign investment patterns, and the growing tendency toward economic protectionism. Furthermore, the study investigates whether the ongoing tariff war reflects a broader shift toward neo-mercantilism in international economic relations. By exploring the strategic dimensions of the conflict, the research seeks to identify potential future scenarios for global trade governance and the evolving balance between free trade and state-led economic competition.
Research Methodology
This research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach and relies on qualitative content analysis. The theoretical framework is developed based on major theories of international political economy and international trade, particularly perspectives related to economic nationalism, strategic trade policy, and neo-mercantilism. These theoretical perspectives provide the basis for identifying potential causal mechanisms linking the tariff war to structural changes in global trade.  Data were collected through extensive library research, including academic articles, books, reports published by international organizations, policy papers, official government statements, and documents issued by trade institutions. The collected materials were systematically examined and coded using qualitative content analysis techniques in order to identify recurring themes, patterns, and causal relationships. To enhance the reliability and validity of the findings, the study employs two case studies focusing on specific dimensions of the United States–China tariff war. These cases were selected to illustrate how tariff measures have influenced trade flows, investment decisions, and supply-chain restructuring. Through process-tracing and comparative analysis, the research evaluates the broader implications of these developments for the future of global trade.
Findings
The findings indicate that the tariff war between the United States and China is not merely a temporary commercial dispute but rather a strategic manifestation of geo-economic rivalry between two major powers. The conflict has significantly affected bilateral trade relations by increasing trade barriers, reducing market predictability, and generating uncertainty for businesses and investors. One of the most important consequences of the tariff war has been the reconfiguration of global supply chains. Faced with rising tariff costs and growing political risks, multinational corporations have increasingly diversified their production networks and relocated parts of their manufacturing activities to alternative destinations in Asia and other regions. This trend has accelerated the transformation of global production systems and reduced the concentration of manufacturing activities in a single country. The study also finds that the tariff war has contributed to changes in international investment patterns. Many firms have reconsidered their investment strategies in response to shifting trade regulations and geopolitical tensions. As a result, foreign direct investment flows have become increasingly influenced by political and strategic considerations rather than purely economic factors. Another significant finding concerns the growing resurgence of protectionist and neo-mercantilist policies. Both the United States and China have increasingly employed trade instruments as tools of strategic competition. Tariffs, industrial subsidies, export controls, and technology restrictions have become important mechanisms through which states seek to enhance national competitiveness and secure strategic industries. This development reflects a departure from traditional liberal trade principles and signals a broader transformation in the international economic order.
The findings further suggest that the tariff war has weakened confidence in multilateral trade institutions, particularly the World Trade Organization. The inability of existing mechanisms to effectively manage disputes between major powers has encouraged states to pursue unilateral or regional approaches to trade governance. Consequently, regional trade agreements and strategic economic partnerships have gained greater importance in shaping the future architecture of global trade.
Conclusion
The study concludes that the United States–China tariff war represents a fundamental challenge to the existing global trading system. Rather than being a short-term economic disagreement, the conflict reflects a deeper process of geo-economic competition and strategic rivalry between the world's leading economic powers. Its effects extend beyond bilateral trade and encompass global production networks, investment flows, trade governance structures, and international economic norms. The continuation of the tariff war is likely to accelerate the transition toward a more fragmented and multipolar trading system characterized by increased protectionism, regionalization, and strategic competition. Such developments may contribute to the gradual erosion of the liberal international trade order and strengthen neo-mercantilist approaches to economic policy. Therefore, the future of global trade will increasingly depend on the ability of international institutions and major powers to adapt to these emerging realities. Without effective mechanisms for dispute resolution and cooperative economic governance, the risks of prolonged trade conflicts and systemic instability are likely to increase. In this context, the tariff war between the United States and China serves as a critical indicator of the broader transformations currently reshaping the global economy and the future trajectory of international trade.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Tariff War
  • United States
  • China
  • Global Trade
  • Neo-Mercantilism
  • Economic Protectionism
  • World Trade Organization
  • Geo-Economics
چگنی‌زاده، غلامعلی و زارع، محمد . (1403). بازخیزش چین و سیاست نگاه به شرق هند. پژوهشنامه روابط جهانی، 1(4)، 81-122.
ذبیحی، رضا و گلستانی، جواد . (1403). الگوی توسعه اقتصادی چین و چشم‌انداز بومی‌سازی آن در ایران: تحلیلی آینده‌نگر بر روندها و سناریوهای محتمل. پژوهشنامه روابط جهانی، 1(4، 123-160.
زاهدی خطیر، الهام؛ صالحی، مختار (1401). روند پژوهی تداوم جنگ تجاری آمریکا علیه چین (2018-2022)، روابط خارجی، 14(55)، 133-162.
شفیعی، نوذر (1401). از جدایی اقتصادی تا پیوند بیشتر: تحلیلی بر آینده جنگ تجاری امریکا علیه چین، روابط خارجی، 14(53)، 1-27.
صالحی، سید حمزه؛ موسوی شفایی، سید مسعود (1402). جنگ ژئواکونومیک آمریکا و چین و تأثیر آن بر نظم اقتصاد بین‌الملل، رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، 15(2)، 11-34.
غفارزاده، لیلا؛ برزگر، کیهان؛ مجید توسلی رکن‌آبادی، (1403). جنگ تجاری آمریکا و چین؛ تأثیرات آن بر روابط ایران و چین، پژوهش‌های روابط بین‌الملل، 14(4)، 31-61.
فتح الهی، افشار؛ حاجی مینه، رحمت، دهشیار، حسین (1402). اختلاف چین و آمریکا در سازمان تجارت جهانی و تأثیر آن بر رقابت استراتژیک برای هژمونی، جستارهای سیاسی معاصر، 14(4)، 87-112.
قربانی شیخ‌نشین، ارسلان؛ حداد زند، شیرین (1402). جنگ تجاری چین و ایالات‌متحده آمریکا و پیامد آن بر کشورهای جنوب شرق آسیا؛ مطالعه موردی ویتنام و تایوان، رهیافت‌های سیاسی و بین‌المللی، 14(3)، 201-228.
نای، جوزف. (۱۳۹۳). آینده قدرت، مترجم؛ با مقدمه م. سریع‌القلم، چاپ دوم). تهران: فرزان.
References
Al Jazeera. (2025, July 31). Tariff wars: Has Donald Trump killed the WTO? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/7/31/tariff-wars-has-donald-trump-killed-the-wto?utm_source=chatgpt.com
AP News. (2025, April 4). The EU publishes a US product hit list and prepares for WTO action against Trump's tariffs. https://apnews.com/article/7ecab3aad84cb108c96cc6b242fcedc8?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Bekkers, E., & Schroeter, S. (2020). An economic analysis of the US-China trade conflict. Economic Research and Statistics Division, World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/
Belesky, P., & Lawrence, G. (2018). Chinese state capitalism and neomercantilism in the contemporary food regime: Contradictions, continuity and change. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/
Belesky, P., & Lawrence, G. (2018). The multi-polar political economy: rising powers and new global dynamics. Routledge.
Brands, H. (2018). American Grand Strategy in the Age of Trump. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Chagani-Zadeh, Gholamali, & Zare, Mohammad. (2024). China’s resurgence and India’s Look East policy. Global Relations Research Journal, 1(4), 81–122. [In Persian]
Chor, D., & Li, B. (2024). Illuminating the effects of the US-China tariff war on China’s economy. Journal of International Economics, 150, 103926.
Cohn, T. (2016). Global political economy (7th ed.). Routledge.
Cohn, T. H. (2016). Global political economy: Theory and practice (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
European Parliament. (2025). Revisiting WTO Tariff Commitments under Article XXVIII of GATT. Brussels: Policy Department for External Relations.
Ezrati, M. (2022, December 25). Biden escalates the economic war with China. Forbes. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ezrati/2022/12/25/biden-escalates-the-economic-war-with-china
Fajgelbaum, P., Goldberg, P., Kennedy, P., Khandelwal, A., & Taglioni, D. (2022). The US-China trade war and global reallocations (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9894). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9894
Fathollahi, Afshar; Hajimineh, Rahmat; & Dehshyar, Hossein. (2023). China–U.S. disputes in the World Trade Organization and their impact on strategic competition for hegemony. Contemporary Political Essays, 14(4), 87–112. [In Persian]
Financial Times. (2020). U.S.-China trade war leaves global economy counting the cost. Retrieved October 9, 2022, from https://www.ft.com/content/7/a613b06-7118-11e9-bbfb5-c68069fbd15
GATT. (1947). General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (Articles I, II, and XXI). Geneva: World Trade Organization.
Ghaffarzadeh, Leila; Barzegar, Keyhan; & Tavassoli Rokn Abadi, Majid. (2024). The U.S.–China trade war and its effects on Iran–China relations. Journal of International Relations Research, 14(4), 31–61. [In Persian]
Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, Arsalan, & Haddad Zand, Shirin. (2023). The China–United States trade war and its consequences for Southeast Asian countries: A case study of Vietnam and Taiwan. Journal of Political and International Approaches, 14(3), 201–228. [In Persian]
Inan, F. (2005). The political economy of global trade. Palgrave Macmillan.
Inan, S. (2005). Geoeconomic policies for regional development: Turkey as a catalyst for Eastern Europe. Ekonomika, (60), 30–45.
International Monetary Fund. (2024). The macroeconomic consequences of import tariffs and trade policy uncertainty (IMF Working Paper No. 24/19). Washington, D.C.: IMF. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2024/01/19/The-Macroeconomic-Consequences-of-Import-Tariffs-and-Trade-Policy-Uncertainty-543877
International Monetary Fund. (2024). The macroeconomic consequences of import tariffs and trade policy uncertainty. IMF Policy Paper.
Itakura, K. (2020). Evaluating the impact of the US–China trade war. Asian Economic Policy Review, 15(1), 77-93.
Jain, M., & Saraswat, S. (2019). US–China trade war: Chinese perspective. Manag Econ Res J, 5(2019).
Kapustina, L., Lipková, Ľ., Silin, Y., & Drevalev, A. (2020). US-China trade war: Causes and outcomes. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 73, p. 01012). EDP Sciences.
Kholid, M. (2022). The US-China Trade War Phenomenon (2018-2020) In Economic Diplomacy Perspective. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 7(1), 83-97.
Kurt, S. (2021). A neo-mercantilist analysis of the political economy of U.S. foreign policy under Trump’s rule. Codrul Cosminului, 259, 1–284.
Kurt, S. (2021). Protectionism in the modern international economy. Journal of International Trade Studies, 14(2), 260–278.
Liu, T., & Woo, W. T. (2018). Understanding the US-China trade war. China Economic Journal, 11(3), 319-340.
Liu, Z. (2022, June 16). China is hardening itself for economic war. Foreign Policy. Retrieved October 2, 2022, from https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/06/16/china-economic-war-decoupling-united-states-containment/
Nye, Joseph S. (2014). The Future of Power. Translated into Persian with an introduction by Mahmoud Sariolghalam (2nd ed.). Tehran: Farzan Publishing. [In Persian]
OECD. (n.d.). OECD international trade statistics. https://www.oecd.org
Salehi, Seyed Hamzeh, & Mousavi Shafaee, Seyed Masoud. (2023). The U.S.–China geoeconomic war and its impact on the international economic order. Journal of Political and International Approaches, 15(2), 11–34. [In Persian]
Shafiei, Nouzar. (2022). From economic decoupling to greater interdependence: An analysis of the future of the U.S. trade war against China. Foreign Relations Quarterly, 14(53), 1–27. [In Persian]
Statistics Times. (2023). Comparing United States and China by Economy. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://statisticstimes.com/economy/united-states-vs-china-economy.php
Steinbock, D. (2018). US-China trade war and its global impacts. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 4(04), 515-542.
UNCTAD. (n.d.). UNCTADstat: International trade database. https://unctadstat.unctad.org
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). Global trade shifts under tariff escalation: A review of U.S.–China trade flows (2018–2023). UN DESA Trade and Development Report.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2025, March). World economic situation and prospects: Briefing, No. 188. New York: UN DESA. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/publication/world-economic-situation-and-prospects-march-2025-briefing-no-188
Vassallo, J. (2022, June 16). Developmental realism. Phenomenal World. Retrieved September 23, 2022, from https://www.phenomenalworld.org/reviews/developmental-realism
Vassallo, R. (2022). The return of protectionism: Neo-mercantilism in the 21st century. International Economic Review, 45(1), 55–74.
Veebel, V. (2015). Baltic pathways from liberal trade model to neo-mercantilism in the European Union. Managing Global Transitions, 13(3), 213–229.
Veebel, V. (2015). Export-led growth and neo-mercantilist strategies in global politics. Journal of Global Affairs, 7(3), 210–223.
WITA. (2023). The WTO Panel Report on U.S. Section 232 Tariffs: Implications for Security Exceptions. Washington D.C.: Washington International Trade Association.
World Bank. (2024). GDP (current US$) – China. World Bank National Accounts Data. Retrieved July 14, 2025, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=CN
World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS). (n.d.). Global trade analytics. https://wits.worldbank.org
World Trade Organization (WTO) Panel Report. (2022). Russia – Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (DS512). Geneva: WTO Dispute Settlement Body
World Trade Organization (WTO). (1994a). GATT 1994: Article I – Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
World Trade Organization (WTO). (1994b). GATT 1994: Article II – Schedules of Concessions. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
World Trade Organization (WTO). (2019). National Security Exceptions under GATT Article XXI: Analytical Overview. Geneva: WTO Secretariat.
World Trade Organization. (2025). Implementation of the currently suspended reciprocal tariffs: Global trade outlook 2025. WTO Trade Monitoring Report.
World Trade Organization. (2025, April 16). Trade forecast: Global merchandise trade volume projected to decline by 1.5% amid ongoing tariff policies. Geneva: WTO. Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news25_e/cpro-tfore_16apr25_e.pdf
Zabihi, Reza, & Golestani, Javad. (2024). China’s economic development model and the prospects for its localization in Iran: A forward-looking analysis of trends and possible scenarios. Global Relations Research Journal, 1(4), 123–160. [In Persian]
Zahedi Khatir, Elham, & Salehi, Mokhtar. (2022). Trend analysis of the continuation of the U.S. trade war against China (2018–2022). Foreign Relations Quarterly, 14(55), 133–162. [In Persian]
Zeng, K., Wells, R., Gu, J., & Wilkins, A. (2022). Bilateral tensions, the trade war, and US–China trade relations. Business and Politics, 24(4), 399-429.
Zheng, J., Zhou, S., Li, X., Padula, A. D., & Martin, W. (2023). Effects of eliminating the US–China trade dispute tariffs. World Trade Review, 22(2), 212-231.
Ziegler, C. E., & Menon, R. (2014). Neomercantilism and great-power energy competition in Central Asia and the Caspian. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 8(3), 17–41.
Ziegler, C., & Menon, R. (2014). Anarchy and the state: Contemporary perspectives in international relations. Oxford University Press.
 
Translated References into English
Chagani-Zadeh, Gholamali, & Zare, Mohammad. (2024). China’s resurgence and India’s Look East policy. Global Relations Research Journal, 1(4), 81–122. [In Persian]
Fathollahi, Afshar; Hajimineh, Rahmat; & Dehshyar, Hossein. (2023). China–U.S. disputes in the World Trade Organization and their impact on strategic competition for hegemony. Contemporary Political Essays, 14(4), 87–112. [In Persian]
Ghaffarzadeh, Leila; Barzegar, Keyhan; & Tavassoli Rokn Abadi, Majid. (2024). The U.S.–China trade war and its effects on Iran–China relations. Journal of International Relations Research, 14(4), 31–61. [In Persian]
Ghorbani Sheikhneshin, Arsalan, & Haddad Zand, Shirin. (2023). The China–United States trade war and its consequences for Southeast Asian countries: A case study of Vietnam and Taiwan. Journal of Political and International Approaches, 14(3), 201–228. [In Persian]
Nye, Joseph S. (2014). The Future of Power. Translated into Persian with an introduction by Mahmoud Sariolghalam (2nd ed.). Tehran: Farzan Publishing. [In Persian]
Salehi, Seyed Hamzeh, & Mousavi Shafaee, Seyed Masoud. (2023). The U.S.–China geoeconomic war and its impact on the international economic order. Journal of Political and International Approaches, 15(2), 11–34. [In Persian]
Shafiei, Nouzar. (2022). From economic decoupling to greater interdependence: An analysis of the future of the U.S. trade war against China. Foreign Relations Quarterly, 14(53), 1–27. [In Persian]
Zabihi, Reza, & Golestani, Javad. (2024). China’s economic development model and the prospects for its localization in Iran: A forward-looking analysis of trends and possible scenarios. Global Relations Research Journal, 1(4), 123–160. [In Persian]
Zahedi Khatir, Elham, & Salehi, Mokhtar. (2022). Trend analysis of the continuation of the U.S. trade war against China (2018–2022). Foreign Relations Quarterly, 14(55), 133–162. [In Persian]