الگوی توسعه اقتصادی چین و چشم انداز بومی سازی آن در ایران: تحلیلی آینده نگر بر روندها و سناریوهای محتمل

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار روابط بین‌الملل، بنیاد ایران شناسی، تهران، ایران.

2 کارشناسی ارشد روابط بین‌الملل دانشگاه علامه‌طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.

10.22054/jrgr.2025.87598.1124

چکیده

چین با ترکیب حاکمیت مقتدر و راهبری دولتی، برنامه‌ریزی بلندمدت و تمرکز بر رشد صادرات‌محور، طی چهار دهه اخیر به یکی از الگوهای موفق توسعه اقتصادی در سطح بین‌المللی تبدیل شده است. این پژوهش با رویکرد آینده‌پژوهی ساختاری، امکان‌سنجی و محدودیت‌های بومی‌سازیِ الگوی توسعه چینی در ایران را مورد بررسی قرار می‌دهد. مسئله پژوهش این است که «کدام اجزا و مکانیسم‌های مدل توسعه چین قابل تطبیق با شرایط نهادی، سیاسی و اقتصادی ایران هستند و چه سناریوهایی برای فرایند بومی‌سازی قابل تصور است؟» روش پژوهش کیفی و مبتنی بر آینده‌پژوهی ساختاری است، داده‌ها از تحلیل محتوای متون علمی و اسناد رسمی، مجموعه داده‌های آماری بین‌المللی و ملی و دیدگاه‌های خبرگان جمع‌آوری شد. ابزار تحلیلی شامل تحلیل روند، شناسایی و وزن‌دهی عدم‌قطعیت‌های حیاتی، ماتریس اثر متقابل و فرآیند سناریونویسی ساختاری است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که مولفه‌هایی همچون برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی دولتی، سیاست‌های حمایتی برای صنایع منتخب و راهبرد تنوع‌بخشی بازارها قابلیت اقتباس دارند، اما فقدان انسجام نهادی، بحران اعتماد اجتماعی، ضعف در ظرفیت نوآوری و محدودیت‌های ژئوپلیتیکی، موانع جدی بومی‌سازی به‌شمار می‌روند. بر پایه دو محور عدم‌قطعیت کلیدی «اراده و توان دولت برای اصلاحات ساختاری» و «میزان گشایش و تعامل بین‌المللی» چهارسناریوی بدیل طراحی شده است؛ تنها در سناریویی که اصلاحات نهادی واقعی و گسترش تعاملات بین‌المللی هم‌زمان رخ دهد، بومی‌سازی موفق و پایدارِ عناصر منتخبِ مدل چینی محتمل خواهد بود، هرچند تفاوت‌های نهادی و سیاسی دو کشور، ضرورت بومی‌سازی تدریجی و متناسب با ساختار حقوقی و فرهنگی ایران را آشکار می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Chinese development, Localization, Critical Futures Studies, Iran’s economic development.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Zabihi 1
  • Javad Golestani 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Iranology Foundation, Tehran, Iran.
2 M.A., Department of International Relations, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran.Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The rise of China as one of the most successful models of economic development over the past four decades has drawn significant attention from many developing countries. Gradual reforms after 1978, the integration of market mechanisms with state guidance, export-oriented strategies, and massive infrastructure investment have turned China into a prominent example of a “developmental state.” This model has played a central role in bureaucratic efficiency, attracting foreign investment, developing strategic industries, and integrating into global value chains, while demonstrating resilience during the 2008 financial crisis and the U.S.–China trade war. In Iran, alongside the expansion of Tehran–Beijing relations and the growing orientation toward the East, the debate on the possibility of “indigenizing China’s development model” has become an important topic in policymaking and futures research.
Although Iran and China share certain similarities—such as the strong role of the state and centralized planning—there are notable differences in political structure, institutional cohesion, political culture, innovation capacity, and geopolitical context.
Research Question(s)
Therefore, key questions emerge regarding the feasibility of adopting the Chinese model in Iran, the existing institutional and structural barriers, and the plausible future pathways. The central research question asks which components of China’s development model can be localized in Iran and what scenarios can be envisioned for the future trajectory of this process?
Literature Review
The literature review shows that extensive studies from (Johnson,1982) and Wade’s developmental state theories to analyses by (Brandt & Rawski, 2008) highlight the role of the state and industrial policy in China’s success. The review goes under these subheadings. In Iran, reports by (the Parliament’s Research Center,2020) and recent studies such as (Mohammadi et al, 2024). have addressed the possibility of learning from China’s experience. However, most Iranian studies remain descriptive and rarely adopt a structural foresight approach focused on drivers, uncertainties, and future pathways. Despite the vast literature on the Chinese model, forward-looking, scenario-based analyses on its active localization in Iran remain limited a gap this research seeks to fill.
Methodology
Methodologically, the study employs qualitative analysis and structural futures research, using document analysis, international indicators, statistical data, and the scholarly literature. Analytical tools include trend analysis, driver identification, critical uncertainties extraction, cross-impact matrix, and structural scenario building. The research identifies China’s major development trends—gradual reforms, active industrial policy, infrastructure investment, technology acquisition, developmental bureaucracy, export-oriented strategy, and innovation-driven growth. Two pivotal uncertainties are selected: (1) the Iranian government’s willingness and capacity for structural reforms, and (2) the condition of the international order and the extent of external openness. Based on these two axes, four macro-scenarios are developed: Asian Leap, Development in a Cage, Structural Missed Opportunities, and Collapsing Isolation.
Results
The study concludes that localizing China’s development model in Iran is possible, but not through direct imitation or political replication. China’s success is the product of a complex combination of Confucian culture, authoritarian political order, professional bureaucracy, and gradual reforms—factors that either do not exist in Iran or function differently. Iran can adopt China’s economic, industrial, and technological components but cannot reproduce China’s political or cultural structures. Therefore, localization must be gradual, adaptive, and aligned with Iran’s institutional and social realities. The four scenarios demonstrate that only under the “Asian Leap”—the combination of domestic structural reforms and external openness—can localization be successful and sustainable. “Development in a Cage” yields slow and unstable progress; “Structural Missed Opportunities” reflects the loss of favorable international conditions;
Discussion
The objective of the study is to conduct a futures-oriented analysis of the trends and plausible scenarios for localizing China’s economic development model in Iran. To achieve this, the research uses a hybrid theoretical framework combining the developmental state theory, adaptive modernization, and critical futures studies, enabling simultaneous analysis of institutional, cultural, and future-oriented dimensions. Three core research questions guide the study: (1) Which key elements of China’s development model are transferable to Iran? (2) What structural, institutional, cultural, and geopolitical challenges hinder its localization? (3) Given major future uncertainties, what scenarios can be projected for the localization process? The research aims to go beyond descriptive or imitative interpretations and provide a comprehensive analytical outlook on capacities, constraints, and future pathways.
Conclusion
Findings indicate that several components of China’s development model hold significant potential for localization in Iran, including strategic state planning, targeted industrial policy, support for selected industries, export market diversification, digital and physical infrastructure development, and technology acquisition through joint cooperation. These components are primarily economic and technical and can be adapted to Iran’s existing capacities. However, challenges such as institutional fragmentation, governance weaknesses, social trust deficits, restricted foreign relations, oil dependency, policy instability, and weak innovation and R&D represent major obstacles. Cultural differences also matter: Confucian values such as order, discipline, hierarchy, and the prioritization of collective interest—key sources of legitimacy for development policies in China—cannot be fully replicated in Iran.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Chinese development
  • Localization
  • Critical Futures Studies
  • Iran’s economic development
  1.  فارسی

    1. دره شیری، م (۱۴۰۳). «شکست حکمرانی اقتصاد ایران در جنگ نظریه‌پردازی». پژوهش‌نامه انتقادی متون و برنامه‌های علوم انسانی ، 24(۱)، 175-206
    2. دوله، ف، سیف الهی،س و زنجانی، ح(1397)، بررسی تاثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر حکمرانی خوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی
    3. شریفی.ج(1392)، مطالعه استراتژی توسعه صنعتی چین و پیشنهادهایی برای ایران،پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی.
    4. شاه علی.ا، اسدی.م، سلیم بیگی.ح. (1399). تحلیل مضمونی توسعه سیاسی در قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه جامعه شناسی سیاسی ایران، 3(3)،85-61.
    5. مرکز پژوهش‌های مجلس شورای اسلامی. (۱۴۰۲). درآمدی بر الگوی حکمرانی همجوشی صنعتی و فناوری در کشور چین و درس‌هایی برای ایران. دفتر مطالعات انرژی، صنعت و معدن.
    6. محمدی.ا، صالحی.م، قزلسفلی.م (1403)، امکان‌سنجی الگوبرداری ایران از مدل توسعه اقتصادی چین، فصلنامه مطالعات بنیادین و کاربردی جهان اسلام 6(19) ،289-259.

    Referernces

    1. Arnason,J&Eickelman,D&Eisenstadt,S, et al (2000),multipleModernities, Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    2. Brandt, L., & Rawski, T. G. (2008). China's Great Economic Transformation. Cambridge University Press.
    3. Breslin, S. (2011). The “China Model” and the Global Crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese Mode of Governance?. International Affairs, 87(6), 1323–1343.
    4. Chang, H., et al. (2022). Scenario planning for economic development in emerging economies: Lessons from Asia. Futures, 136, 102787.
    5. H.Jianwu&L.Shantong&Polaski(2007),china’s Economic prospects 2006-2020, CarnegieEndowment for International peace, N.83,1-56
    6. Inayatullah, S. (1990). Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Future: Predictive, Cultural and Critical Epistemologies. Futures, 22(2), 115–141.
    7. Inayatullah, S. (1998). Causal Layered Analysis: Poststructuralism as Method. Futures, 30(8), 815–829.
    8. Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, Stanford: Stanford University Press,1925–1975.
    9. Knoerich,J&Mouan,L&Goodburn,C(2021),Is china’s model of SEZ-led development viable?A call for smart replication,Journal of Current Chines Affairs,248-262
    10. Kennedy, S. (2010). The Myth of the Beijing Consensus. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(65), 461–477.
    11. Le, Vivian(2023), Development and Authoritarianism: China’s Political Culture and Economic Reforms, E-International Relations
    12. Miller, R. (2007). Futures Literacy: A Hybrid Strategic Approach. Palgrave Macmillan,Futures,399(4),341-362
    13. Morrison, Wayne M. (2019). China’s Economic Rise: History, Trends, Challenges, and Implications for the United States, CRC Report, RL33534
    14. Nye, J. S. (2015). Is the American Century Over? Polity Press,130(3)
    15. Shambaugh, D. (2008). China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. University of California Press.
    16. Tipps, Dean C. (1973). “Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies” Journal: Comparative Studies in Society and History, 15(2)
    17. Wang, H., & Hu, A. (2007). The Chinese Dream: A Society of the Middle Class. Beijing: Foreign Language Press.
    18. Wu Jinglian (2005). Various essays on China's economic reform, China Europe International Business School.
    19. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton University Press.

    منابع اینترنتی انگلیسی

    1. Grace To(2025, February,13). China’s technological self-reliance: a Strategic response to Trump tariff, Retrieved from: https://eccellenzedimpresa.it/en/magazine/chinas-technological-self-reliance-a-strategic-response-to-trump-tariff/
    2. Word Bank(2023), Retrieved from: https://databank.worldbank.org
    3. World Bank. (2022). Iran Economic Monitor: Turning the Tide?. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/iran
    4. World Bank. (2025). Research and development expenditure (% of GDP), Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/%20GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS
    5. World Bank. (2024). Iran Economic Monitor, Spring 2024: Sustaining Growth Amid Rising Geopolitical Tensions - With a Special Focus: Recent Poverty and Inequality Trends in Iran (2020–2022). Retrieved from: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099051007102421530/pdf/IDU-39800829-628d-4b5a-a9f9-728b946987e4.pdf
    6. IMF(International Monetary Fund)(2023), https://data.imf.org/CDIS
    7. OECD(The Organisation for Economic Co-operation) (2023), Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/msti.htm
    8. DigitalReport(March 2025), Digital 2025: Iran, Retrieved from: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-iran
    9. UNCTAD(2022), Retrieved from: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Index.html
    10. UNCTAD(2025), World Investment Report 2025, Retrieved from: https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/wir_fs_ir_en.pdf
    11. (2023). FAOSTAT Statistical Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/faostat

    منابع اینترنتی فارسی

    1. مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی،روند برنامه ریزی توسعه در کشور چین،آبان 1391،قابل دسترس در: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/news/show/820760
    2. مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی، مروری بر تجربه مناطق آزاد و ویژه اقتصادی جهان(6): کشور چین،اردیبهشت 1404، قابل دسترس در: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1836581
    3. مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی، لایحه بودجه 1404 در حوزه نفت و روابط مالی آن با دولت، قابل دسترس در: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/news/show/1819807
    4. مرکز پژوهش های مجلس شورای اسلامی، بررسی مدل توسعه صنعت خودروسازی در کشورهای پیشرو (1): نگاهی به مسیر توسعه صنعت خودرو چین،مرداد، 1403، قابل دسترس در:https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1811515
    5. موسسه تحقیقات جمعیت کشور، تحولات جمعیتی، خرداد 1403، قابل دسترس در: https://nipr.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%B9%DB%8C%D8%AA%DB%8C-NIPR.pdf
    6. کنفرانس بین المللی نخبگان مدیریت، خرداد 1395، بررسی نقش حکمرانی خوب در کارآمدی دولت ها، قابل دسترس در: https://www.sid.ir/FileServer/SF/3881395h01327
    7. دنیای اقتصاد (29 دی 1403)، رشد اقتصادی در سرازیری، https://www.magiran.com/article/4579467
    8. فرهیختگان (1 اسفند 1401)، زنگ خطر بودجه تحقیق و پژوهش بلندتر از هر زمان دیگر،قابل دسترس در: ir/78134
    9. سیویلیکا (13 آذر 1403)،محمدپور، تنگه هرمز: نقطه حساس ژئوپلیتیکی در منطقه خاورمیانه، https://civilica.com/note/7657/
    10. دیپلماسی ایران، محمود سریع القلم (11 آبان 1403)، بنیادی‌ترین نقصانِ سیاستِ خارجی ایران، قابل دسترس در: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2029057/
    11. دیپلماسی ایران، محمود سریع القلم (2 مهر 1403)، شاقول های فهمیدنِ وضعیت حکمرانی در یک کشور، قابل دسترس در: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2028357/
    12. دیپلماسی ایران، محمود سریع القلم (26خرداد 1403)، ایران کجای دنیای رو به جلو ایستاده است؟، قابل دسترس در: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/news/2029057/

    Translated References into English

    1. Darreh Shiri, M. (2024). “The Failure of Iranian Economic Governance in the War of Theorizing.” Critical Research Journal of Humanities Texts and Programs, 24(1), 175-206. [In Persian]

    Doleh, F, Seif Elahi, S. and Zanjani, H. (2018), Investigating the impact of social capital on good governance, Islamic Azad University. [In Persian]

    Mohammadi, A., Salehi, M., Ghazelsafli, M (1403), Feasibility study of Iran's emulation of China's economic development model, Quarterly Journal of Fundamental and Applied Studies of the Islamic World 6(19), 259-289. [In Persian]

    Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. (2023). An Introduction to the Governance Model of Industrial and Technological Fusion in China and Lessons for Iran. Energy, Industry and Mining Studies Office. [In Persian]

    Sharifi, J (2013), Study of China's Industrial Development Strategy and Suggestions for Iran, Master's Thesis, Bu-Ali Sina University, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences. [In Persian]

    Shah Ali.A., Asadi.M., Salim Beigi.H. (2019). Thematic analysis of political development in the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iranian Quarterly Journal of Political Sociology, 3(3), 85 61. [In Persian]

    Online References

    Civilica (4 Dec 2024), Mohammadpour, Strait of Hormuz: A geopolitical hotspot in the Middle East, https://civilica.com/note/7657/[In Persian]

     

    Donya Eqtesad (19 January 2024), Economic growth in decline, https://www.magiran.com/article/4579467 [In Persian]

    Farhikhtegan (Feb 20, 2022), The alarm bell for research budgets is louder than ever, available at: fdn.ir/78134[In Persian]

    International Conference on Management Elites, June 2016, Examining the role of good governance in the effectiveness of governments, available at: https://www.sid.ir/FileServer/SF/3881395h01327 [In Persian]

    National Population Research Institute, Population Developments, June 2024 available at: https://nipr.ac.ir/wp-content/uploads/2024 /06 /%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AC%D9%85%D8%B9%DB%8C%D8%AA%DB%8C-NIPR.pdf[In Persian]

    Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Development Planning Process in China, November 2012, available at: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/news/show/820760 [In Persian]

    Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, A Review of the Experience of Free and Special Economic Zones in the World (6): China, (May 2025), available at: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1836581[In Persian]

    Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, 2025 budget bill in the field of oil and its financial relations with the government, available at: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/news/show/1819807[In Persian]

    Research Center of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, Study of the Development Model of the Automotive Industry in Leading Countries (1): A Look at the Development Path of the Chinese Automotive Industry, August 2024, available at: https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1811515[In Persian]